Technical reporting — as a service

You do the field work.
We handle the paperwork.

Send us your raw field data — photos, voice notes, handwritten forms, spreadsheets, PDFs. We return a structured, source-grounded report, reviewed by a human before it reaches you.

Get in Touch See a Sample Report
Insurance adjusting · Home inspection · Environmental · Engineering field reports
field-notes_adjuster.jpg
scope-of-damages_p1.pdf
FINAL_REPORT.PDF
Excerpt of a delivered report
1 source conflict flagged
Risk-free · No commitment

Your first report is on us.

Send us one real job — your raw field data and what you’d normally write up. We’ll turn it into a finished report at no cost, so you can judge the quality for yourself before you ever pay a cent.

Claim your free report
Services

Two ways to work with us

Report Production

Send us your raw field data: photos, voice notes, handwritten notes, spreadsheets, PDFs, video. We structure it, verify it against your sources, and return a polished, professionally reviewed report ready to send under your name or your firm’s branding.

Delivered within 48 hours

Independent Report Review

Keep your own reporting process. Send us a finished report along with the source materials behind it, and we return a review memo flagging every discrepancy, unsupported figure, and item needing verification before the report goes out the door.

Delivered within 24 hours

What We Do

Reasoning, not just generation

Most AI report generators produce plausible prose. We built something different: a reasoning engine that reads your source material against sector-specific rules, then runs the result through generation, QA, and adversarial passes to surface contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies before a single word leaves our hands.

Every report is then reviewed by a business analyst with decades of experience turning complex information into clear, defensible documentation. By the time you receive it, the details have been handled.

“What surprised us most was that the AI rarely hallucinated — the source documents did.”

Conflicting dates between field notes. Figures that didn’t reconcile between a photo log and a spreadsheet. Descriptions that drifted as revisions piled up. Issues the original authors hadn’t caught — surfaced for review, every time.

How It Works

From field data to finished report

01

Send us your field data

Photos, voice notes, spreadsheets, handwritten notes, PDFs, video. Whatever you’ve got, in whatever shape you’ve got it.

02

We structure, verify, and review

The reasoning engine structures your data against sector-specific rules and runs multi-pass verification against your sources. A business analyst reviews every report before delivery.

03

You receive a polished report

Delivered as a professional PDF, ready to send under your name — or under your firm’s branding for white-label engagements.

Sample Report

What we work with, and what we deliver

A real engagement, redacted. On the left, the raw material we received — handwritten forms, photos, spreadsheets, scanned PDFs. On the right, an excerpt from the report we returned. In the middle is the part that matters: a contradiction buried in the sources that the engine caught.

Input Source material
Handwritten adjuster checklist
field-notes.jpg
Cleanup log
cleanup-log.pdf
Typed cleanup sheet
cleanup-typed.xlsx
Floor and heater notes
floor-notes.xlsx
Scope of damages
scope_p1.pdf
Flat rate estimate
estimate.pdf

A representative mix: handwritten field notes, phone photos, spreadsheets, and scanned PDFs — arriving in no particular order or format.

Output Report excerpt
FINAL_REPORT.PDF — SCOPE OF DAMAGES
Excerpt of a delivered report showing reasoning-engine conflict notes

The yellow blockquote is a conflict note raised by the reasoning engine and surfaced for human review — not buried.

generation → QA pass → adversarial review → analyst sign-off
QA · Source conflict caught

Two source documents disagreed on the drywall quantity — by a factor of two.

flat-rate-estimate.pdf
Carries 620 sq ft of affected wall — a 2 ft water height × 310 linear ft.
scope-of-damages_p1–2.pdf
Records a 4 ft drywall replacement height — 310 × 4 = 1,240 sq ft.

Flagged for human review. A 620 sq ft difference that changes the price of the job. The engine didn’t guess which was right — it surfaced the contradiction and told the analyst exactly where to verify it from the field photos.

Download the Full Sample Report (PDF)
Independent Report Review

A second set of eyes before your report goes out

If you already have a reporting process you trust, we offer the verification layer on its own. Send us a finished report along with the source materials behind it: field notes, photos, spreadsheets, estimates, scanned forms. Our reasoning engine compares the report against its sources in detail, and a business analyst reviews every finding. Your report is never altered or reproduced; the review memo is the sole deliverable, returned within 24 hours.

Source Discrepancy

The report and its sources disagree, or the sources disagree with each other. Conflicting dates, figures that don’t reconcile, quantities that changed between documents.

Not Substantiated

A statement in the report that the provided documents don’t support. Nothing contradicts it, but nothing backs it up either.

Item for Verification

Something worth confirming before the report is relied on, with a note on exactly which source to check and why.

Every finding cites the documents involved, quotes the conflicting figures, offers a possible explanation, and states how to verify it. It’s an independent check before the report carries your name to a carrier, examiner, or client.

Download a Sample Review Memo (PDF)
Sectors

Built to adapt

The architecture is sector-agnostic. We work across technical reporting disciplines, including:

Insurance adjusting
Home inspection
Electrical contracting & planning
Depreciation reporting
Environmental assessment
Building condition assessment
Engineering field reports
Construction progress reporting

Don’t see your sector? When a new field comes into scope, we work with you to capture its structure, required content, and any regulatory or legal references. The engine handles the rest.

About

Built by a practitioner

Insurance
Pharmaceutical
Telecommunications
Nuclear
Municipal & federal government
Enterprise consulting

Boxall Technical Reporting was founded by Bill Boxall, a business analyst with decades of experience in documentation, requirements analysis, and making complex information understandable. His work has spanned insurance, pharmaceutical, telecommunications, nuclear, municipal and federal government, and enterprise consulting — every one a domain where messy source material has to become precise, defensible documentation, and where the cost of getting it wrong is real.

BTR exists to solve a problem every field professional knows: you’re good at your job in the field, but the hours at a desk writing it all up are where the day gets long. We built this service so you can focus on what you do best — and so the reporting comes back better than you’d have time to make it yourself.

Confidentiality

How your files are handled

Your materials are handled with the confidentiality they’d receive inside your own firm. Files are processed by our reasoning engine and reviewed only by the analyst working your file. Source materials are used solely to produce your deliverable and are never used for any other purpose. After delivery, files are retained for 90 days for revision requests, then destroyed, or destroyed immediately on request.

Contact

Let’s talk

The fastest way to judge us is on your own material. Send one real job and we’ll turn it into a finished report — your first one is free. No risk, no commitment.

Prefer email? — attach a sample of what you’re working with.